|
|
|
|
Newsletter Article - Last updated November 2002 |
![]()
Roger Frood is a dulcimer maker, running Dove Dulcimers in Somerset. This article first appeared in the Nonsuch Newsletter in 1993.
Over this year's festival season, I have often found myself giving advice to people who have bought dilapidated old dulcimers. The advice usually boils down to "Try to get your money back!". Also, in talking to prospective customers, I keep coming up against the old misconception that it is impossible to make a dulcimer that will stay in tune. The common theme here is that people don't seem to know what to look for in a new dulcimer or what to avoid in an old one. In short, what makes a good dulcimer, old or new.
New instruments usually have a maker's name, and that name will have a reputation, though every maker would agree that individual instruments vary, and so a good reputation is no guarantee of a good instrument. Of course, the expertise of makers grows with time, so I know that I would not now be proud of every instrument I have made in the past though I was doing my best at the time. If you are looking at an old instrument then it may well not have a good known name or anything else to help you judge how good it is. So, old or new, it is best to know how to make up your mind about the quality of the instrument.
Some general points
All dulcimers make a compromise between the conflicting requirements of the
strength that is needed to support the tension of the strings and
the flexibility wanted to provide response, tone and volume.
Exactly where an instrument falls within that compromise represents
choices that the maker made:
- always with a degree of guesswork;
- often unconsciously; and
- sometimes with complete reckless ignorance.
For the maker, the problem is that the response, tone and volume tend to improve as string tension rises, and to make a soundbox that will hold a ton of tension (or even two) in permanent equilibrium, you have to know what you are doing.
The problem is not the load of one ton, as such. That could be supported on the end of a block of soft wood half an inch square. The real problem is not stress but deflection, arising from the fact that the strings rise to cross the side bridges, and rise again to cross the main bridges. The rise of the strings pulls upwards on the pinblocks and presses down through the bridges, tending to bend the frame, twist the pinblocks and sheer the joints. The steeper the rise of the strings, the greater all these forces are (think of the difference between an archer's bow at rest, and at full stretch), and a lot of the structural faults in dulcimers can be seen to come from this source.
The next few sections outline a set of questions that you might like to ask when looking at a possible purchase.
Checklist - Structural
To see if the frame joints have moved,
look for uneven
surface where parts meet, gaps in the joints, signs of extra
strengthening such as screws, brackets, plates etc.
If the frame joints show any signs of having moved, then it will
be difficult if not impossible to tune the instrument, and it will
almost certainly not stay in tune.
Checklist - Tunability
Checklist - Tuning stability
Checklist - Sounding good
Obviously, this topic involves some subjective judgement and taste, and what
suits your needs will depend not only on what pleases your ear, but on the
setting you want to play in - solo, pub session, dance band, rock group etc.
You might find these questions helpful.
Finally
Finally, inspect the general level of workmanship, the neatness, the finish,
and if there is anything that you are uneasy about, say so, and ask
questions. To any competent woodworker, the dulcimer looks like an
easy instrument to make and I have seen many homemade dulcimers that look
reasonably good. However, to make a dulcimer that can support a ton of
tension, stay in tune for a good while, and sound good as well, takes
a fair amount of analysis, understanding, design refinement and experience.
After that, the woodwork is relatively easy.
Copyright © Roger Frood, 1993. All Rights reserved.
|
Newsletter Article - Last updated November 2002 |